hit more fairways. make more putts. avoid the hazards. play by the rules.
Newsflash: Tin Foil Hats Don’t Work

Posted on Saturday 12 November 2005

ali2_thumbnail.jpegA paper published by MIT researchers shows definitely that tin foil hats, regardless of configuration, are ineffective at blocking the Government’s ability to read one’s mind using satellites and that the standard type of TFH actually may enhance the ability of multinational corporations to influence a person’s thinking.

[W]e find that although on average all helmets attenuate invasive radio frequencies in either directions (either emanating from an outside source, or emanating from the cranium of the subject), certain frequencies are in fact greatly amplified. These amplified frequencies coincide with radio bands reserved for government use according to the Federal Communication Commission (FCC). Statistical evidence suggests the use of helmets may in fact enhance the government’s invasive abilities. We speculate that the government may in fact have started the helmet craze for this reason.

Using sophisticated network analysis equipment and techniques under laboratory conditions the researchers, from the famed Media Lab as well as the Electrical Engineering and Computer Science department, tested the effects of three configurations of TFH at three different cranial locations on each of four test subjects. The results are stunningly counterintuitive.

The helmets amplify frequency bands that coincide with those allocated to the US government between 1.2 Ghz and 1.4 Ghz. According to the FCC, These bands are supposedly reserved for ”radio location” (ie, GPS), and other communications with satellites (see, for example, [3]). The 2.6 Ghz band coincides with mobile phone technology. Though not affiliated by government, these bands are at the hands of multinational corporations.

It requires no stretch of the imagination to conclude that the current helmet craze is likely to have been propagated by the Government, possibly with the involvement of the FCC. We hope this report will encourage the paranoid community to develop improved helmet designs to avoid falling prey to these shortcomings.

Thanks to Dave Farber’s IP list


  1.  
    November 14, 2005 | 4:17 am
     

    Man that is geeky even by my standards. :-)

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.